Boy Scouts of America legal documents state that  Butler was TERMINATED February 29, 2016 BY the BSA, not by Butler.

Gary Butler claims that is a lie and that he RETIRED in December 2015 and that he, not the Scouts terminated his employment. 

Who should the voters believe? 

​

BSA states that Butler was TERMINATED February 29, 2016,  BY the Scouts and that he was given 'severance benefits to which he was not otherwise entitled and other goods and services."

BSA filed Form 990 with the Federal Government showing that in 2016 they paid Gary Butler $820,399 to Feb 2016. This is the year AFTER Butler claims he retired. 

Butler claims on his website that "My severance package was the standard offering that senior personnel received then they retired."

Which is true and which is a coverup?

​

source - Boy Scouts of America lawsuit Case 3:17-cv-00079-N filed Jan 9, 2017 and BSA Federal 990 filing for 2016.

See below for more details from these documents. 

​​

Butler offers a letter as his proof that he RETIRED in December 2015. 

Butler also claims that "My severance package was the standard offering that senior personnel received when they retired."

If that is true, why do the Scouts claim that he received 'severance benefits to which he was not otherwise entitled and other good and valuable consideration"?

Why did the Scouts claim that "In direct violation of the General Releases, Defendant now specifically threatens legal action against the BSA."?

​

Butler claimed that the General Releases that he had just signed were unenforceable. Then why did  he sign them?